Removing indirect primaries could increase political godfatherism, says ex-AG
Alex Ter Adum, a former Attorney General of Benue State, has raised concerns over the recent amendment to Nigeria’s electoral law that eliminates indirect primaries. He believes this change could worsen godfatherism and manipulation in party candidate selection. Adum argues that limiting parties to only direct primaries and consensus weakens internal democracy and increases the risk of disputes. He points out that each method has its flaws, but removing indirect primaries may create more problems than it solves.
Key takeaways
- Alex Ter Adum criticised the removal of indirect primaries, warning it could worsen godfatherism and manipulation in party nominations.
- He explained that indirect primaries served as a balance between direct primaries and consensus, both of which have significant weaknesses.
- Adum cited the 2023 APC governorship primary in Benue State as an example, noting discrepancies between primary and general election results.
- He argued that consensus primaries give too much power to party leaders and political godfathers, undermining internal democracy.
- The amendment to the electoral law has sparked debate among legal experts and party stakeholders about its impact on future elections.
